Now, when
we check that the expressions of the Mayan priests in Apocalypto are identical
to those of the Jewish priests that murdered Christ in The Passion, we can
affirm, we can assure that the antichristian hate, the hate toward Mel Gibson,
will make a true cinematographic-Wall of Berlín: the antichristian community of
Hollywood – that is to say , only the antichristian community of Hollywood -
will never allow the director of Apocalypto to be rewarded with an Oscar again.
And this
will be this way, because Mel Gibson has become a symbol for Christian people:
the Passion
returned to the Christian community the Easter, the Christian Easter.
Apocalypto
has returned the European Americans the pride of the conquest and the
colonization of America.
Before the Passion,
the Christian should remind the Easter looking at movies of Moses, the King
David, the Exodus, or any figure of the old testament appropriate to the Jewish
Easter.
And when in
some of those movies Christ appeared, us, the Christian, alone we saw a
beautiful face that smiled and it never suffered to redeem our sins.
And the
bad were, of course, only the Romans.
The passion
recovers for the Christian community the lost identity.
Apocalypto
recovers for the American community of European origin the heroic saga of its
grandparents: the conquest of a hostile continent and the construction of a new
world, a new beginning for all, especially for subjected American people and
enslaved by the autochthonous dictatorships and for the forces of the nature.
A new world
guided by the Faith, the plow and the sword.
Mel Gibson
is much more than a simple cinema director.
He is a
true movie prophet.
Their film are a message: a text to remember the texts of a world of understanding
and tolerance that we have not still been able to build for the hate.
Mel Gibson,
with The Passion rescued us - to the Christian - of a world without God, a
Easter without Passion.
Mel Gibson,
with Apocalyto rescued us - to the Americans of European origin - of a world
governed by a new racism: the aided indigenist racism and promoted by the
progres (sive) antichristians.
In
Apocalypto the hero's pursuers, victims of the forces of the nature die: one
for the bite of a snake ; another for a stone submerged in the river ; a third
for a trap for animals ; the first one in the forest for the claws of a
panther; a henchman for the boss's tyrant power ; the executioner - in the
stone city - for the hero's hands.
A special
paragraph deserves the death of another of the pursuers. This character,
moribund for the stings of the bees, receives the blow of grace by means of
thorns poisoned by a toad and heady with a blowpipe made with leaves: the use
of the nature to destroy other human beings.
How many
times have the gods in those that believe who criticize Mel Gibson for their
violent movies eliminated their enemies by means of the use of the natural
forces?
Please!!!
Finish with
the hypocrisy and the lie!!!!
The
violence in "the list of Schlinder" or in "the soldier
Ryan" it is the same one that in the Passion or in Apocalypto, unless that
those that criticize Mel Gibson believe that the characters of Mel Gibson
doesn't have the same value like people, that is to say that don't deserve as
much violence as the characters of the movies mentioned to make the comparison.
That those that suffer in “Schlinder” and in “Ryan” they are of a superior
human quality, for that reason the violence is the appropriate one and on the
other hand, the character of The Passion doesn't deserve so much violence and
for that reason there is an excess of violence. And the same thing happens with
the victims in Apocalypto.
Some,
absurdly, criticize Apocalypto for the topic of the eclipse of sun saying that
the Mayan knew the movement of the stars with accuracy.
This is
true.
But, the Mayan priest takes advantage of this knowledge to manipulate
people according to his pleasure and convenience. Ordinary people didn't have
knowledge of astronomy!!!!!
That is the
same thing that to think that any North American citizen has today knowledge of
atomic energy or of the control of the climate or of the chemical weapons!!!
Some, point
out that the arrival of the Europeans took place a lot after the disappearance
of the Mayan empire. Those are the same ones that reject the Mexicans and that
today experts are declared in Mayan culture!!!!!!!
For I
finish, a warning to those who reject the American Christian and they call them
disparagingly inhabitants of "Jesusland."
I propose
that we call them - to these true religious racists - inhabitants of:
Mosesland,
Mahomaland, Drugsland, Lesbianland, Gayland, Abortionland, Adulteryland and
anyone of their synonyms, as it corresponds.
Because,
regrettably, it seems that the enemies of Mel Gibson wants to begin another
Guerra Santa.
Mel Gibson
- as Clint Eastwood - it could overcome the wonderful characters that it
embodied and he became a great cinema director.
But,
contrarily to what happened to Clint, Mel is politically incorrect for the Fair
of Vanities that is horrified by the consumption of alcohol of Gibson but that
she drinks until the label of the bottles.
The
violence that Mel Gibson describes in its movies is a support point to meditate
on the wrongs that it suffers the human society, a starting point to build a
really fair world, a Christian world.
The
violence that other directors describe - and the critics that live inside the
system applaud and they follow the commandments that the system imposes - they
are alone to delight in her and to forget the possibility of the change, the
moral imperative of carrying out it.
Finally,
and to continue with this true cultural crusade I propose - like simple admirer
– that Mel Gibson films Santa Claus true history: How the Norman of Robert
Guiscard, led by Sichelgaita of Salerno, Roger Borsa and Bohemond began the
first crusade rescuing the bones of San Nicholas of Myra taking them to Bari
and beginning this way the current Santa Claus birth, the most popular saint in
the world.
Guillermo Compte Cathcart
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario